HOME
Sex News Online

{short description of image}

TOPICS

{short description of image} A BLOW TO FREEDOM
Mother's "Child-Porn" Photo Case Dismissed after Counseling

Beastiality

Deviations

Fetishes

Incest

Prostitution

Same Sex

Three or More

Underage

Evil



BOOKS

LINKS

MOVIES


Send news items to:
Sex News Online


ELYRIA, Ohio (AP) -- Charges were dismissed as promised Monday in the case of a mother who took pictures of her 8-year-old daughter in the shower that prosecutors claimed were lewd.

Cynthia Stewart, 48, of Oberlin, had avoided trial by agreeing to undergo counseling for six months and to give up the pictures to be destroyed. She had faced as many as 16 years in prison if convicted of illegal use of a child in nudity-oriented material and pandering sexually oriented material.

The pictures, taken in the summer of 1999, showed her daughter rinsing off her genital area with a shower spray. Stewart, who has taken thousands of snapshots of her daughter, had acknowledged that two pictures could be interpreted as sexually oriented. But she said they were not intended to be and were never meant for use outside the family.

The free speech case attracted attention from around the country and criticism from the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio. People donated more than $40,000 for Stewart's defense.

Lorain County Prosecutor Gregory White said he would pursue any similar case in the same way. ``I don't think she intended to create the pictures she did,'' White said. ``She was very naive about the circumstances that exist in the world'' in terms of Internet pornography, White said. ``I do what I think is right. I do not react to criticism.''

Stewart had to complete counseling on adolescent sexuality and show that she understands what constitutes sexually oriented material.

Stewart was not required to be at Monday's hearing when Common Pleas Judge Edward Zaleski dismissed the charges and could not be reached to comment on the action. A telephone message was left at her home.

Her lawyer, Amy Wirtz, said Stewart agreed to have the photos destroyed but wanted people to know that ``she finds the destruction of her pictures reprehensible and unnecessary.'' Destroying the pictures ``came with the package, and she understands that she can't back out of the deal she entered into,'' Wirtz said.

Stewart was charged after a Mansfield photography lab alerted police to the pictures. Wirtz said Stewart wants photo labs to establish a clear policy ``so that an innocent person would not be put through this torture. She believes there should be some screening process to protect children, but it needs to be more refined.''

Sponsored by: Ashley's Sex Toys and Adult Video Store